Missing Bottom Molars

Charlie Wilson's War

USA 2007

DIRECTOR

Mike Nichols

INTERPRETERS

Tom Hanks, Amy Adams, Julia Roberts, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Emily Blunt and Rachel Nichols

SCREENPLAY

Aaron Sorkin

"We were glorious and changed the world ... and then we sent to become the ultimate tease." This is the final part of the film that establishes a mocking truth. "We have sold weapons and trained them there they knocked down the Twin Towers, but how is that possible? "The following is the most common question among Americans since 2001." The reason is explained in this latest film by Mike Nichols. The story of Charlie Wilson, Republican of Texas, who in the '80s has managed to provide funds to $ 1 billion to arm the mujahideen of 'Afghanistan against the common enemy Russia. If at first glance the story seems to bring a modern political films (Syriana for example) the staging (which looks more like a play) is a comic farce with a taste for sarcastic mock power in any part the world does business. Ideologically speaking Nichols's film resembles the works of Joe Dante, like the American Civil War. The main theme is the same, the unawareness of the political light and frivolous to make history. Any small gesture has tremendous impact in the future (The beat of butterfly contemporary). It is here that the film Nichols is essential to understand the present day. A monument to politically correct the lack of diplomatic and political values \u200b\u200bof our age. The historical factor, however, the film serves as the setting for more jokes and put in place against jokes that turn out to be the best thing about the film. The dialectical clashes between the various characters are very well written and amazingly acted with exquisite taste and reasoned ad hoc. Dialogues built a fast pace that disorient the viewer and the normal light that is in search of the real movie out of the film season (dialogue between Hanks and Hoffman are superb). But there's little wonder: Nichols is a master at this. Instead, what does turn up their nose is the large amount of pain displayed. A sinister use of his legs and arms cut off not benefit the purpose of the film. It seems that the film attempts several times to preach good and bad scratching. A few words to spend on the second part too fast and didactic: the impression is that they rush to finish the film even if it lasts more or less an hour and a half. Difficult to understand this move. However, if just one fails to make trouble out of his chair to go see Charlie Wilson this, please know that we can comfort with Amy Adams and his hair dangling like the mane of a horse and under nymphets hens but still visions. Special mention to the dance of the ultra-sexy Emily Blunt, pity that Nichols was more interested in making us feel what the characters were saying that you forget that the poor Blunt. Some Sometimes it's better to shut up!

Daniele Pellegrini